Marry someone you are at least attracted to. If you dive into it with a certain expectation then you will never be happy. This will also cause differences in opinion! People have different ideas for raising their child. People have depression and don’t know how to deal with it. People break up because they changed physically and not attractive anymore. Just a small act of affection and appreciation is enough. You don’t have to say I love you every single day. We had to tell him to take a look at himself first and see what he is doing wrong. And complains to us that his wife isn’t showing any interest in him like before. Now they have a kid and stopped doing all that. When he was in love he would take her to different vacations, dates, etc. ![]() One of my friend stopped doing all the romantic things he used to do before. Some people don’t realise marriage is a maintenance. Now they are married and he feels trapped. She was always texting him, and he loved the attention. I know people who loved their clingy girlfriend. ![]() How will you deal with it.ĭuring the love or honeymoon phase everything is fine. Some phase in your life you will be ultra horny and your wife simply doesn’t want sex. It’s not always possible that you and your wife have same libido at all times. Other things also like libido or man and woman change drastically between different age sets. How will you deal with finances? What if you made a wrong investment and now in debt. What next? Kids? What next? Job? What next? Fees? What if your wife got post partial depression and doesn’t want to work anymore. It’s human nature to always go for something better. You and your wife might have different goals. My argument is that your method for success is way more dependent on luck than the process. Don't get me wrong, I am happy that you found love in your marriage. You got lucky and hit a jackpot, but the keyword is lucky, very lucky (and indeed like people who find success in various other fields, you think that it's all you and undermine the luck factor). But there is nothing worse than marrying someone without knowing them well. The level of compromise required is very high.Īll in all, there is no best kind of marriages. You have few options other than to tolerate and maybe love each other. In arranged marriages, often it's not just you, but the families getting married. Also the families will be easier to handle in case it doesn't work out. You can filter out the people you can't fall in love with and understand your own preferences. But in that case, you have the agency and it's in you. Ofcourse this may also be the case in love marriages since people change. They may feel like they are stuck in a prison with no escape (since the families and society will pressurise you to stay in the marriage no matter what). For you the level of compromise was within your tolerance level, for others, it may not be. For others they may not like what they find at all. In your case, you two liked discovering each other's likes/dislikes. But you definitely need to know them beforehand. I have seen so many loveless arranged marriages to know that. But to say that what worked for you will work for others is a long stretch. Livemint tops charts as the fastest growing news website in the world □ Click here to know more.It's good for you. ![]() The bench made these observations in its verdict which held the top court has the discretion to dissolve a marriage on the ground of “irretrievable breakdown" in the exercise of its plenary power under Article 142 (1) of the Constitution and can grant divorce by mutual consent while dispensing with the 6-month waiting period mandated under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Other factors which have to be considered included orders passed in the legal proceedings from time to time, cumulative impact on the personal relationship, whether and how many attempts were made to settle the disputes by intervention of the court or through mediation, and when the last attempt was made, the court added. The court said the marriage has irretrievably broken down is to be factually determined and firmly established and for this, several factors are to be considered - such as the period of time the parties had cohabited after marriage, when the parties had last cohabited, the nature of allegations made by the parties against each other and their family members. Earlier this month, the top court said it can exercise its powers under Article 142(1) of the Constitution to grant divorce on the ground of “irretrievable breakdown" of a marriage- whether it is by mutual consent, or even if one of the parties opposes it.Ī five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S K Kaul said it is obvious that the top court should be fully convinced and satisfied that marriage is “totally unworkable, emotionally dead and beyond salvation" and therefore, dissolution of marriage is the right solution and the only way forward.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |